Howard v. W.J. S.R.R. Co.
144 A. 919, 104 N.J. Eq. 201, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 504
This text of 144 A. 919 (Howard v. W.J. S.R.R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Howard v. W.J. S.R.R. Co., 144 A. 919, 104 N.J. Eq. 201, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 504 (N.J. 1929).
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Leaming, and reported in
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None. *Page 202
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Price v. New Jersey Mfrs. Ins. Co.
846 A.2d 617 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2004)
Ellen S. Barry v. Honoria Donnelly, William Donnelly
781 F.2d 1040 (Fourth Circuit, 1986)
City of Bedford v. The James Leffel & Co.
558 F.2d 216 (Fourth Circuit, 1977)
Rocco D. Longo v. The Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company, New York Central System
355 F.2d 443 (Third Circuit, 1966)
Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Wilson
372 P.2d 551 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1962)
Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal
359 U.S. 231 (Supreme Court, 1959)
Renault v. L. N. Renault & Sons, Inc.
90 F. Supp. 630 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1950)
Albachten v. Bradley
3 N.W.2d 783 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1942)
Penny v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
258 N.W. 522 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1934)
Pamozzo v. Carborundum Co.
7 F. Supp. 317 (W.D. New York, 1934)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
144 A. 919, 104 N.J. Eq. 201, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-wj-srr-co-nj-1929.