Howard v. Wilmington & Susquehanna Rail Road
This text of 2 Del. 471 (Howard v. Wilmington & Susquehanna Rail Road) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Per Curiam.
J. M. Clayton, Chief Justice:
We doubt the authority of the court to make such an order. The constitution opens this court to all suitors, and secures to them the administration of justice without delay. We don’t see how we can notice the pendency of a suit in the courts of another state, much less the cause for which that action was brought. K judgment in another state fpr the same cause of action may be pleaded in bar, but we know of no authoi’ity to arrest proceedings in our court, merely because a suit is pending in another court, of another state. No authority was shown in Randel’s case, and I always understood the order was made without argument.
So Mr. Bayard took nothing by his motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Del. 471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-wilmington-susquehanna-rail-road-delsuperct-1838.