Howard v. Wellham

41 S.E. 62, 114 Ga. 934, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 838
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 12, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 41 S.E. 62 (Howard v. Wellham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howard v. Wellham, 41 S.E. 62, 114 Ga. 934, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 838 (Ga. 1902).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

In a suit upon several of a series of promissory notes,'some due and some not matured except under a stipulation that they should become due if any one of the series was not paid within thirty days after maturity, a verdict of a jury is necessary before a judgment can be rendered. A suit on notes not due except by virtue of such a stipulation is not “founded on unconditional contracts in writing,” within the meaning of paragraph 7 of section 4 of article 6 of the constitution of this State. This case is controlled by Rodgers v. Caldwell, 112 Ga. 635, and cases therein cited.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Little, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

HARTSFIELD COMPANY NO. 3, INC. v. Williams
151 S.E.2d 908 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Hamby v. Hamby
90 S.E.2d 50 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
Jones v. North American Life Insurance
168 S.E. 923 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Pierce v. Jones
137 S.E. 296 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Pape v. Woolford Realty Co.
134 S.E. 174 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Apperson v. Mutual Fertilizer Co.
96 S.E. 260 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)
Cooper v. Ricketson
80 S.E. 217 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 S.E. 62, 114 Ga. 934, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-wellham-ga-1902.