Howard v. Washington County
This text of 512 F. App'x 353 (Howard v. Washington County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[354]*354Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Andre J. Howard, et al., appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Howard v. Washington County, No. 1:12-cv-00035, 2012 WL 4324948 (W.D.Va. filed Sept. 19, 2012; entered Sept. 21, 2012). We deny Howard’s motion for judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
512 F. App'x 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-washington-county-ca4-2013.