Howard v. W. U. Tel. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Howard v. W. U. Tel. Co.

49 So. 1036, 161 Ala. 213, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 190

DecidedJune 10, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 49 So. 1036 (Howard v. W. U. Tel. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howard v. W. U. Tel. Co., 49 So. 1036, 161 Ala. 213, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 190 (Ala. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

SIMPSON, J.

This action was brought by the appellant, against the appellee, for damages for failure to deliver a telegram, set out in the statement of the case. Whether there were errors or not is immaterial, as the evidence on the question of the agency of the sender of the telegram was not sufficient to submit that matter to the jury.; and the court properly gave the general charge in favor of the defendant.

The judgment of the court is affirmed.

Dowdell, C. J., and Denson and Mayfield, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SIMPSON, J.

This action was brought by the appellant, against the appellee, for damages for failure to deliver a telegram, set out in the statement of the case. Whether there were errors or not is immaterial, as the evidence on the question of the agency of the sender of the telegram was not sufficient to submit that matter to the jury.; and the court properly gave the general charge in favor of the defendant.

The judgment of the court is affirmed.

Dowdell, C. J., and Denson and Mayfield, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 So. 1036, 161 Ala. 213, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-w-u-tel-co-ala-1909.