Howard v. Virginia Employment Commission

Alexandria County Circuit Court

Howard v. Virginia Employment Commission

29 Va. Cir. 244, 1992 Va. Cir. LEXIS 85

CourtAlexandria County Circuit Court

DecidedOctober 28, 1992

DocketCase No. (Law) CL920555

StatusPublished

This text of 29 Va. Cir. 244 (Howard v. Virginia Employment Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alexandria County Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howard v. Virginia Employment Commission, 29 Va. Cir. 244, 1992 Va. Cir. LEXIS 85 (Va. Super. Ct. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

By Judge Alfred D. Swersky.

This matter is before the Court on the petition for review of the decision of the Virginia Employment Commission denying unemployment benefits because of willful misconduct as contemplated by Code § 60.2-618(2). Petitioner claims the facts do not support the Commission’s conclusion and further argues that he carried his burden of showing mitigating circumstances.

This court finds that there is evidence which supports the Commission’s finding of willful misconduct and that the conduct of the Petitioner could properly be found to be willful misconduct in connection with Petitioner’s employment.

However, the findings of the Commission ignore the medical evidence presented by Petitioner. The Commission simply concludes that his medical condition “does not excuse the threatening statements he made . ...” No evidence supports this conclusory statement, and in view of the substantial evidence relating to Petitioner’s physical and mental condition at the time of the incidents in question, this Court finds the decision of the Commission denying Petitioner unemployment benefits to be in error.

For these reasons, the decision of the Commission is reversed, and the Petitioner shall be entitled to unemployment benefits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By Judge Alfred D. Swersky.

This matter is before the Court on the petition for review of the decision of the Virginia Employment Commission denying unemployment benefits because of willful misconduct as contemplated by Code § 60.2-618(2). Petitioner claims the facts do not support the Commission’s conclusion and further argues that he carried his burden of showing mitigating circumstances.

This court finds that there is evidence which supports the Commission’s finding of willful misconduct and that the conduct of the Petitioner could properly be found to be willful misconduct in connection with Petitioner’s employment.

However, the findings of the Commission ignore the medical evidence presented by Petitioner. The Commission simply concludes that his medical condition “does not excuse the threatening statements he made . ...” No evidence supports this conclusory statement, and in view of the substantial evidence relating to Petitioner’s physical and mental condition at the time of the incidents in question, this Court finds the decision of the Commission denying Petitioner unemployment benefits to be in error.

For these reasons, the decision of the Commission is reversed, and the Petitioner shall be entitled to unemployment benefits.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 Va. Cir. 244, 1992 Va. Cir. LEXIS 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-virginia-employment-commission-vaccalexandria-1992.