Howard v. UNC Healthcare System
This text of 444 F. App'x 666 (Howard v. UNC Healthcare System) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Emma Victoria Howard appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Howard v. UNC Health Care Sys., No. 1:10-CV-00047-WO-PTS, 2011 WL 941495 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
444 F. App'x 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-unc-healthcare-system-ca4-2011.