Howard v. Tillamook County
This text of 333 Or. App. 554 (Howard v. Tillamook County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
554 June 26, 2024 No. 458
This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
Sandra HOWARD and Nick Petersen, Petitioners, v. TILLAMOOK COUNTY, Respondent. Land Use Board of Appeals 2023068; A183834
Argued and submitted May 15, 2024. Heather A. Brann argued the case for petitioners. Also on the brief was Heather A. Brann PC. Daniel Kearns argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief was Reeve Kearns PC. Before Jacquot, Presiding Judge, Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Kistler, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. Akiyama v. Tillamook County, 333 Or App 315, ___ P3d ___ (June 26, 2024).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
333 Or. App. 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-tillamook-county-orctapp-2024.