Howard v. Tillamook County

333 Or. App. 554
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided June 26, 2024·No. A183834·Unpublished

Opinion

554 June 26, 2024 No. 458

This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

Sandra HOWARD and Nick Petersen, Petitioners, v. TILLAMOOK COUNTY, Respondent. Land Use Board of Appeals 2023068; A183834

Argued and submitted May 15, 2024. Heather A. Brann argued the case for petitioners. Also on the brief was Heather A. Brann PC. Daniel Kearns argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief was Reeve Kearns PC. Before Jacquot, Presiding Judge, Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Kistler, Senior Judge. Affirmed. Akiyama v. Tillamook County, 333 Or App 315, ___ P3d ___ (June 26, 2024).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howard v. Tillamook County, 333 Or. App. 554 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).

333 Or. App. 554 (Howard v. Tillamook County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Akiyama v. Tillamook County
333 Or. App. 315 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2024)