Howard v. The Rose & Cargo

E.D. New York

Howard v. The Rose & Cargo

34 F. 928, 1888 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86

DecidedApril 7, 1888

StatusPublished

This text of 34 F. 928 (Howard v. The Rose & Cargo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howard v. The Rose & Cargo, 34 F. 928, 1888 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86 (E.D.N.Y. 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

Benedict, J.

This is an action against a cargo of cotton on board the lighter Rose, to recover salvage compensation for the services of the tug Egbert Myers in towing the lighter Rose and her cargo out of the slip between piers 87 and 38 on the occasion of the fire on the morning of February 28, 1887, which destroyed pier 37. The claimants, in their answer, made a tender of $70. This tender, in my opinion, was sufficient, and ought to have been accepted. Let a decree be entered in favor of the libelants for the sum of $70, less the amount of taxable costs which have accrued since the filing of the answer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benedict, J.

This is an action against a cargo of cotton on board the lighter Rose, to recover salvage compensation for the services of the tug Egbert Myers in towing the lighter Rose and her cargo out of the slip between piers 87 and 38 on the occasion of the fire on the morning of February 28, 1887, which destroyed pier 37. The claimants, in their answer, made a tender of $70. This tender, in my opinion, was sufficient, and ought to have been accepted. Let a decree be entered in favor of the libelants for the sum of $70, less the amount of taxable costs which have accrued since the filing of the answer.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 F. 928, 1888 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-the-rose-cargo-nyed-1888.