Howard v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Howard v. State

154 S.W. 547, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 716

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Howard v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 77 Tex. Crim. 185 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 5, 1913·Published

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, J.

In one count appellant was indicted for swindling, the property alleged to be worth $167.87. In another count appellant was indicted for the theft of the same property. . Both counts were submitted to the jury for a finding. The verdict is general, and finds him guilty as charged in the indictment, and fixes his punishment at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

There is no statement of facts and no bill of exception. Without these there is no question raised by the motion for new trial which the court can review. Therefore the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRENDERGAST, J.

In one count appellant was indicted for swindling, the property alleged to be worth $167.87. In another count appellant was indicted for the theft of the same property. . Both counts were submitted to the jury for a finding. The verdict is general, and finds him guilty as charged in the indictment, and fixes his punishment at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

There is no statement of facts and no bill of exception. Without these there is no question raised by the motion for new trial which the court can review. Therefore the judgment is affirmed.

Howard v. State, 154 S.W. 547, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 716 (Tex. 1913).

Pincite

154 S.W. 547 (Howard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.