Howard v. State
This text of 8 S.W. 806 (Howard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We find no material error in the charge of the court, and there is no bill of exceptions in the record specifying any errors in the charge.
As presented in the record; the evidence does not, in our opinion, sustain the conviction. It is sufficient to establish that the defendant .took a horse belonging to Bagley, as charged in the indictment; but it does not establish that such taking was accompanied by a fraudulent intent on the part of the defendant. As we view the evidence, it rebuts the allegation of fraudulent intent.
The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 S.W. 806, 25 Tex. Ct. App. 602, 1888 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-state-texapp-1888.