Howard v. State of Florida
This text of Howard v. State of Florida (Howard v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2022-0994 _____________________________
DAVID HOWARD,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel— Original Jurisdiction.
January 16, 2024
PER CURIAM.
The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.
B.L. THOMAS, ROWE, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ David Howard, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Howard v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.