Howard v. State
792 S.W.2d 13, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 634, 1990 WL 50886
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Dale Howard, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentia-ry hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and an extended opinion would serve no precedential purpose. A memorandum, solely for the information of the parties involved, has been issued expli-eating the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Howard v. State, 792 S.W.2d 13, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 634, 1990 WL 50886 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).
792 S.W.2d 13 (Howard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Howard v. State
967 S.W.2d 256 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998)