Howard v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Howard v. State

171 So. 3d 495, 2015 Miss. LEXIS 393, 2015 WL 4749174

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 4, 2015

DocketNo. 2014-DR-01305-SCT

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 171 So. 3d 495 (Howard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howard v. State, 171 So. 3d 495, 2015 Miss. LEXIS 393, 2015 WL 4749174 (Mich. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

WILLIAM L. WALLER, JR. Chief Justice.

This matter is before the Court en banc on Eddie Lee Howard’s Motion to Vacate Conviction and Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Post-Conviction Relief. Also before the Court are the State of Mississippi’s response to said motion and Howard’s reply to the State’s response.

Howard previously filed with this Court a petition for post-conviction relief, in which he raised claims of newly discovered evidence and requested leave to pursue DNA testing of biological evidence to support his claims. This Court granted Howard’s request for DNA testing and dismissed his other claims without prejudice, to be ’refiled with the DNA test results. Howard v. State, 49 So.3d 79, 80 (Miss.2010). Testing is now complete, and Howard has resubmitted his previously filed claims through the instant motion.

After due consideration, the Court finds that Howard should be granted leave to file his petition for post-conviction relief in the trial court, and the trial court should rule on the petition after first conducting an evidentiary hearing on the following issue:

Whether the newly discovered evidence presented in Howard’s Motion to Vacate Conviction, including the results of his post-conviction DNA testing, is of such a nature that it “will probably produce a different result or induce a different verdict, if a new trial is granted.” Crawford v. State, 867 So.2d 196, 204 (Miss.2003) (citing Meeks v. State, 781 So.2d 109, 112 (Miss.2001)).

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Eddie Lee Howard is granted leave to file his petition for post-conviction relief in the Circuit Court of Lowndes County within forty-five days after the issuance of this Court’s mandate, and that the trial court shall rule on that petition after first holding an evidentiary hearing on the above issue.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ William L. Waller, Jr. WILLIAM L. WALLER, JR., CHIEF JUSTICE FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

WILLIAM L. WALLER, JR. Chief Justice.

This matter is before the Court en banc on Eddie Lee Howard’s Motion to Vacate Conviction and Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Post-Conviction Relief. Also before the Court are the State of Mississippi’s response to said motion and Howard’s reply to the State’s response.

Howard previously filed with this Court a petition for post-conviction relief, in which he raised claims of newly discovered evidence and requested leave to pursue DNA testing of biological evidence to support his claims. This Court granted Howard’s request for DNA testing and dismissed his other claims without prejudice, to be ’refiled with the DNA test results. Howard v. State, 49 So.3d 79, 80 (Miss.2010). Testing is now complete, and Howard has resubmitted his previously filed claims through the instant motion.

After due consideration, the Court finds that Howard should be granted leave to file his petition for post-conviction relief in the trial court, and the trial court should rule on the petition after first conducting an evidentiary hearing on the following issue:

Whether the newly discovered evidence presented in Howard’s Motion to Vacate Conviction, including the results of his post-conviction DNA testing, is of such a nature that it “will probably produce a different result or induce a different verdict, if a new trial is granted.” Crawford v. State, 867 So.2d 196, 204 (Miss.2003) (citing Meeks v. State, 781 So.2d 109, 112 (Miss.2001)).

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Eddie Lee Howard is granted leave to file his petition for post-conviction relief in the Circuit Court of Lowndes County within forty-five days after the issuance of this Court’s mandate, and that the trial court shall rule on that petition after first holding an evidentiary hearing on the above issue.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ William L. Waller, Jr. WILLIAM L. WALLER, JR., CHIEF JUSTICE FOR THE COURT

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 So. 3d 495, 2015 Miss. LEXIS 393, 2015 WL 4749174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-state-miss-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack