Howard v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Howard v. State

319 S.E.2d 80, 171 Ga. App. 221, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2154

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 15, 1984

Docket68560

StatusPublished

This text of 319 S.E.2d 80 (Howard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howard v. State, 319 S.E.2d 80, 171 Ga. App. 221, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2154 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Banke, Presiding Judge.

On appeal from the defendant’s conviction of burglary, his appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and supporting brief pursuant to Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406) (1976). After considering the points raised in the brief and conducting a thorough examination of the record and transcript to determine independently whether there was any ground for reversal, this court previously determined that there was no arguable merit to the appeal and granted the motion to withdraw. Based on our determination that the evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to enable any rational trier of fact to find the defendant guilty of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt, we now affirm the conviction. See generally Crawford v. State, 245 Ga. 89 (1) (263 SE2d 131) (1980).

Judgment affirmed.

Pope and Benham, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Banke, Presiding Judge.

On appeal from the defendant’s conviction of burglary, his appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and supporting brief pursuant to Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406) (1976). After considering the points raised in the brief and conducting a thorough examination of the record and transcript to determine independently whether there was any ground for reversal, this court previously determined that there was no arguable merit to the appeal and granted the motion to withdraw. Based on our determination that the evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to enable any rational trier of fact to find the defendant guilty of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt, we now affirm the conviction. See generally Crawford v. State, 245 Ga. 89 (1) (263 SE2d 131) (1980).

Judgment affirmed.

Pope and Benham, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

319 S.E.2d 80, 171 Ga. App. 221, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-state-gactapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack