Howard v. State

170 S.E.2d 309, 120 Ga. App. 321, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 765
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 19, 1969
Docket44659
StatusPublished

This text of 170 S.E.2d 309 (Howard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howard v. State, 170 S.E.2d 309, 120 Ga. App. 321, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 765 (Ga. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

Deen, Judge.

Where the evidence on the trial of an indictment for manufacturing liquor shows that the defendant and another were operating a still, with the boilers containing fermented beer in the process of heating but no liquor had been run, and the defendant was heard to say that it was “time to put the cap on” the jury was authorized to find him guilty of an uncompleted attempt to manufacture liquor rather than to find him guilty of the offense charged based on the fact that the beer had already fermented. Traylor v. State, 77 Ga. App. 439 (48 SE2d 749).

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Traylor v. State
48 S.E.2d 749 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 S.E.2d 309, 120 Ga. App. 321, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-state-gactapp-1969.