Howard v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Howard v. State

180 S.E. 905, 51 Ga. App. 556, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 403

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 23, 1935·No. 24657·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MacIntyre, J.

The bill of exceptions not having been certified by the judge as true, the writ of error must be dismissed. See Rountree v. Gibbs, 156 Ga. 170 (118 S. E. 654), where the judge’s certificate is sub[557] stantially the same as the one in the instant ease; also Cady v. Cady, 161 Ga. 556 (131 S. E. 282), and cit.

Decided July 23, 1935. Julius Rink, L. R. Mitchell, for plaintiff in error. James F. Kelly, solicitor-general, J. Ralph Rosser, contra.

Writ of error dismissed.

Broyles, O. J., amd Guerry, J., eoneu-r.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacIntyre, J.

The bill of exceptions not having been certified by the judge as true, the writ of error must be dismissed. See Rountree v. Gibbs, 156 Ga. 170 (118 S. E. 654), where the judge’s certificate is sub[557] stantially the same as the one in the instant ease; also Cady v. Cady, 161 Ga. 556 (131 S. E. 282), and cit.

Decided July 23, 1935. Julius Rink, L. R. Mitchell, for plaintiff in error. James F. Kelly, solicitor-general, J. Ralph Rosser, contra.

Writ of error dismissed.

Broyles, O. J., amd Guerry, J., eoneu-r.

Howard v. State, 180 S.E. 905, 51 Ga. App. 556, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 403 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

180 S.E. 905 (Howard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related