Howard v. State

162 S.E. 862, 44 Ga. App. 776, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 497
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 17, 1932
Docket21972
StatusPublished

This text of 162 S.E. 862 (Howard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howard v. State, 162 S.E. 862, 44 Ga. App. 776, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 497 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

There was some evidence authorizing the verdict, and the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, and the motion for a new trial containing the usual general grounds only, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

TjuKc, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illmess.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 S.E. 862, 44 Ga. App. 776, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-state-gactapp-1932.