Howard v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Howard v. State

131 S.E. 294, 34 Ga. App. 785, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 36

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 13, 1926·No. 16979·Published

Opinion

Bloodwoeth, J.

In view of the evidence and the statement of the defendant, and of the entire charge of the court, there is no such material error in any of the excerpts from the charge complained of in the motion for a new trial as requires a reversal of the judgment.

The verdict of voluntary manslaughter was not without evidence to support it.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luhe, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodwoeth, J.

In view of the evidence and the statement of the defendant, and of the entire charge of the court, there is no such material error in any of the excerpts from the charge complained of in the motion for a new trial as requires a reversal of the judgment.

The verdict of voluntary manslaughter was not without evidence to support it.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luhe, J., concur.

Howard v. State, 131 S.E. 294, 34 Ga. App. 785, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 36 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

131 S.E. 294 (Howard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.