Howard v. State

372 S.E.2d 813, 258 Ga. 597, 1988 Ga. LEXIS 426
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 20, 1988
Docket45945
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 372 S.E.2d 813 (Howard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howard v. State, 372 S.E.2d 813, 258 Ga. 597, 1988 Ga. LEXIS 426 (Ga. 1988).

Opinion

Hunt, Justice.

Haskie B. Howard was indicted, tried and convicted of the murder of Otis Redding in Tift County.1 He enumerates as error the failure of the trial court to charge on voluntary manslaughter, upon his request.2 We affirm.

When defendant Howard demanded that the victim pay him the $9.35 which the victim owed to him, the victim replied that he would do so when his girl friend got home from work. The defendant went home, got his .38 handgun, and returned to the victim’s house. There, in the victim’s front yard, he confronted the victim again and obscenities were exchanged; then, the defendant shot the victim before several witnesses. In both his statement and at trial, he admitted he intended to shoot the victim, but at trial contended that he believed that the victim was reaching for a weapon when he moved his left hand, even though he knew the victim was right-handed. No weapon was found on the victim.

In his sole enumeration of error, the defendant contends the trial court erred in refusing his charge on voluntary manslaughter. [598]*598Pretermitting the question of whether his assertion that he acted in self-defense precludes his entitlement to such charge, see Stewart v. State, 257 Ga. 211 (5) (356 SE2d 515) (1987); Saylors v. State, 251 Ga. 735 (2) (309 SE2d 796) (1983), it is clear that, as a matter of law, the “serious provocation necessary to excite passion in a reasonable person” is not present. OCGA § 16-5-2 (a); Swett v. State, 242 Ga. 228, 230 (248 SE2d 629) (1978). Thus, we must conclude that the trial court did not erroneously refuse the requested charge.

Decided October 20, 1988. Larry B. Mims, for appellant. David E. Perry, District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Andrew S. Ree, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blake v. State
739 S.E.2d 319 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
372 S.E.2d 813, 258 Ga. 597, 1988 Ga. LEXIS 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-state-ga-1988.