Howard v. State

854 So. 2d 288, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13992, 2003 WL 22135978
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 17, 2003·No. No. 3D03-686·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Ron Howard, filed a motion pursuant to section 3.800(b) to correct his sentence. On February 27, 2003, the trial court entered a corrected sentencing order. However, as the defendant correctly argues, the corrected order failed to grant the defendant any jail and prison credit. Therefore, this cause is remanded for entry of a sentencing order crediting the defendant with the 276 days spent in jail and for the time spent in prison. See Ryan v. State, 837 So.2d 1075 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Baker v. State, 756 So.2d 1091 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Finally, as to Count II, the judgment of conviction references section 775.087. However, a review of the jury’s verdict indicates that the jury did not find that the defendant either carried, displayed, or used a firearm or weapon during the burglary. As such, this cause is also remanded for the purpose of deleting the reference to section 775.087 in the judgment of conviction.

Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howard v. State, 854 So. 2d 288, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13992, 2003 WL 22135978 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

854 So. 2d 288 (Howard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Labissiere v. State
904 So. 2d 516 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)