Howard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Howard v. State

353 So. 2d 920, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 14830

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 4, 1978

DocketNo. 76-1161

StatusPublished

This text of 353 So. 2d 920 (Howard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howard v. State, 353 So. 2d 920, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 14830 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of his judgment of his conviction and sentence for burglary. The judicial error assigned is the action of the trial court in denying appellant’s motion to suppress evidence. However, after the court refused to suppress the evidence in question the appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere without a reservation of the right to appeal the order denying his motion to suppress. Having failed to reserve the right to appeal, appellant is not entitled to the review he seeks. Hand v. State, 334 So.2d 601 (Fla.1976); Eisenman [921]*921V. State, 320 So.2d 34 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Jackson v. State, 294 So.2d 114 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974).

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

CROSS, DOWNEY and LETTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of his judgment of his conviction and sentence for burglary. The judicial error assigned is the action of the trial court in denying appellant’s motion to suppress evidence. However, after the court refused to suppress the evidence in question the appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere without a reservation of the right to appeal the order denying his motion to suppress. Having failed to reserve the right to appeal, appellant is not entitled to the review he seeks. Hand v. State, 334 So.2d 601 (Fla.1976); Eisenman [921]*921V. State, 320 So.2d 34 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Jackson v. State, 294 So.2d 114 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974).

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

CROSS, DOWNEY and LETTS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

353 So. 2d 920, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 14830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-state-fladistctapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack