Howard v. State
164 So. 2d 229, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4265
Opinion
The trial court denied appellant’s petition for relief under Criminal Procedure Rule 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. The order is affirmed upon authority of the rule stated in Simpson v. State, Fla.App.1964, 193 So.2d 224, [opinion filed May 19, 1964]. Appellant’s lack of counsel at the preliminary hearing did not constitute a critical stage in this case. Blake v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 163 So.2d 20, [opinion filed March 31, 1964]. See also Harris v. State, Fla.1964, 162 So.2d 262, [opinion filed March 25, 1964].
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Howard v. State, 164 So. 2d 229, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4265 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).
164 So. 2d 229 (Howard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cavanaugh v. State
249 So. 2d 516 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Jackson v. State
167 So. 2d 903 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Knight v. State
164 So. 2d 229 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)