Howard v. State

128 Ala. 43
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1900·Published

Opinion

McCLELLAN, C. J.

As we read section 9 of the act of February 8, 1899, “To confer additional jurisdiction upon the county court of Lowndes county, and to regulate proceedings tlimein” (Acts, 1898-9, pp. 731-5), it involves no deprivat.on or denial of a jury trial. We construe that section to provide simply and only for the giving of bail by defendants who demand a trial by jury for their appearance at the jury terms of the county court, and in no sense to malee the giving of appearance bonds a condition precedent in any case to having a trial by jury. If a defendant demands a jury but is unable fo give bail for his appearance at the ensuing-jury term he stands, committed, but is none the less entitled to be tried by a jury in accordance with liis. demand when such jury term is held.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howard v. State, 128 Ala. 43 (Ala. 1900).

128 Ala. 43 (Howard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.