Howard v. Smith

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6494

JEROME ANTHONY HOWARD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MR. SMITH, Physician/WRSP; S. K. YOUNG, Warden/WRSP,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-144-7)

Submitted: August 29, 2005 Decided: November 8, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Anthony Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Edward Frye, PENN STUART & ESKRIDGE, Bristol, Tennessee; Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Jerome Anthony Howard appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Howard v.

Smith, No. CA-03-144-7 (W.D. Va. filed Mar. 23, 2005 & entered

Mar. 24, 2005). We further deny Howard’s motion for the

appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -