Howard v. Sills & Purvis
116 S.E. 31, 29 Ga. App. 410, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 38
Opinion
Under the answers of the Supreme Court to the controlling question certified to it by this court, in this action by real-estate brokers for commissions in negotiating a sale of real estate, a verdict for the defendant was demanded by the evidence. It was therefore error to overrule the defendant’s motion for a new trial. 154 Ga. 430 (114 S. E. 580).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Howard v. Sills & Purvis, 116 S.E. 31, 29 Ga. App. 410, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 38 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).
116 S.E. 31 (Howard v. Sills & Purvis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Howard v. Sills & Purvis
114 S.E. 580 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)