Howard v. Sherman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Howard v. Sherman

261 A.D. 963, 26 N.Y.S.2d 859, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8348

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 3, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D. 963 (Howard v. Sherman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howard v. Sherman, 261 A.D. 963, 26 N.Y.S.2d 859, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8348 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant appeals (1) from an order denying defendant’s motion to vacate a judgment entered against him by confession; (2) from an order denying defendant’s motion for a reargument and renewal of Ms previous motion; and (3) from an order denying defendant’s motion to resettle the original order. Order denying defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. In view of the foregoing, the appeal from the order denying defendant’s motion for reargument or for other relief, and the appeal from the order denying defendant’s motion to resettle said order are dismissed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant appeals (1) from an order denying defendant’s motion to vacate a judgment entered against him by confession; (2) from an order denying defendant’s motion for a reargument and renewal of Ms previous motion; and (3) from an order denying defendant’s motion to resettle the original order. Order denying defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. In view of the foregoing, the appeal from the order denying defendant’s motion for reargument or for other relief, and the appeal from the order denying defendant’s motion to resettle said order are dismissed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D. 963, 26 N.Y.S.2d 859, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-sherman-nyappdiv-1941.