Howard v. Ross.

3 N.C. 333

Opinions

Ross continued to be owner notwithstanding this contract, and is liable for the undertakings and miscarriages of Noble. The case in Molloy, 229, 230, is not law, so far as it states the master only to be liable for a deviation or barratry.

There was a verdict for the plaintiff, and a motion made for a new trial, and on the appointed day was fully argued; and now, on this day, being near the close of the term, the Court gave judgment.