Howard v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Florida

Howard v. Roberts

169 So. 486, 124 Fla. 842

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Howard v. Roberts. Read the opinion of the Court — 116 Fla. 381 →

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 17, 1936·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The pleadings, briefs and ultimate questions presented in this case are in all material respects par *843 allel and similar to those presented in the foregoing case of J. S. Howard and his wife, Ethel R. Howard, v. C. A. Roberts, filed this date. The judgment below is accordingly-affirmed on authority of the last entitled cause.

Affirmed.

Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Whitfield, C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The pleadings, briefs and ultimate questions presented in this case are in all material respects par *843 allel and similar to those presented in the foregoing case of J. S. Howard and his wife, Ethel R. Howard, v. C. A. Roberts, filed this date. The judgment below is accordingly-affirmed on authority of the last entitled cause.

Affirmed.

Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Whitfield, C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Howard v. Roberts, 169 So. 486, 124 Fla. 842 (Fla. 1936).

Pincite

169 So. 486 (Howard v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.