Howard v. Riker
11 Abb. N. Cas. 113
This text of 11 Abb. N. Cas. 113 (Howard v. Riker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Howard v. Riker, 11 Abb. N. Cas. 113 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1882).
Opinion
[After stating facts as above.]—The parties had the right to settle, and the defendant’s attorney, not having appeared at that time, had no lien for costs. The plaintiff should be allowed to discontinue without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Smith v. Chenoweth
18 Abb. N. Cas. 20 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1886)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 Abb. N. Cas. 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-riker-nysupct-1882.