Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Howard v. Parrish

Howard v. Parrish

110 S.E. 319, 27 Ga. App. 787, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 428
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 14, 1921
Docket12736
StatusPublished

This text of 110 S.E. 319 (Howard v. Parrish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howard v. Parrish, 110 S.E. 319, 27 Ga. App. 787, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 428 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The petition as amended fails to set forth a cause of action. It was therefore not error for the court to sustain the general demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. R. Lee Moore, for plaintiff,

cited: Civil Code (1910), §§ 4222, 4266, 4268 (1), 5789; 126 Ga. 800; 9 Ga. App. 718; 139 Ga. 453; 95 Ga. 652 (1); 12 Ga. App. 798.

Deal & Renfroe, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maynard & Cheeves v. Render
95 Ga. 652 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1895)
Novelty Hat Manufacturing Co. v. Wiseberg
55 S.E. 923 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Pearson v. Horne
77 S.E. 387 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
Mimms v. Betts Co.
72 S.E. 271 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 S.E. 319, 27 Ga. App. 787, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-parrish-gactapp-1921.