Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Howard v. Parrish

Howard v. Parrish

110 S.E. 319, 27 Ga. App. 787, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 428
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 14, 1921·No. 12736·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

The petition as amended fails to set forth a cause of action. It was therefore not error for the court to sustain the general demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. R. Lee Moore, for plaintiff,

cited: Civil Code (1910), §§ 4222, 4266, 4268 (1), 5789; 126 Ga. 800; 9 Ga. App. 718; 139 Ga. 453; 95 Ga. 652 (1); 12 Ga. App. 798.

Deal & Renfroe, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howard v. Parrish, 110 S.E. 319, 27 Ga. App. 787, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 428 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

110 S.E. 319 (Howard v. Parrish) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maynard & Cheeves v. Render
95 Ga. 652 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1895)
Novelty Hat Manufacturing Co. v. Wiseberg
55 S.E. 923 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Pearson v. Horne
77 S.E. 387 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
Mimms v. Betts Co.
72 S.E. 271 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)