Howard v. Park

59 How. Pr. 344
New York Supreme Court·Decided July 15, 1880·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam. —

The case is within the principle of Musgrave agt. Sherwood (76 N. Y., 194). Prior to the time when the reference to assess damages was granted, the appeal from the judgment had been duly perfected, consequently, under the decision cited, the motion for such reference should have been dismissed. The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements of the appeal, and the motion for a reference to assess damages upon the injunction dismissed without costs, and without prejudice to a renewal upon the final decision of the case upon appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howard v. Park, 59 How. Pr. 344 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1880).

59 How. Pr. 344 (Howard v. Park) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Elliott v. Kuzek
2 Alaska 587 (D. Alaska, 1905)