Howard v. Ozmint

400 F. App'x 769
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 27, 2010·No. No. 10-6106·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stacy W. Howard seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants. The notice of appeal was received in the district court shortly after expiration of the appeal period. Because Howard is incarcerated, the notice is considered filed as of the date it was properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R.App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988). The record does not reveal when Howard gave the notice of appeal to prison officials for mailing. Accordingly, we remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to obtain this information from the parties and to determine whether the filing was timely under Fed. R.App. P. 4(c)(1) and Houston v. Lack. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howard v. Ozmint, 400 F. App'x 769 (4th Cir. 2010).

400 F. App'x 769 (Howard v. Ozmint) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cottman v. Astrue
179 L. Ed. 2d 907 (Supreme Court, 2011)