Howard v. Ozmint

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 30, 2010
Docket09-7393
StatusUnpublished

This text of Howard v. Ozmint (Howard v. Ozmint) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howard v. Ozmint, (4th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7393

STACY W. HOWARD,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

DIRECTOR JON E. OZMINT, of S.C. Department of Corrections also known as John E. Ozmint; WARDEN WILLIE EAGLETON; AARON JOYNER, Major; CAPTAIN KENNETH GREEN; S. SKIPPER, IGC of the Evans Correctional Institution; T. WOOLBRIGHT; S. MOSES; C. FOX; T. SIMMONS; MICHAEL J. STOBBE, Inmate Records; JIMMY EDGE, officer; DAVID BRAYBOY, officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:08-cv-03171-GRA-WMC)

Submitted: August 31, 2010 Decided: September 30, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stacy W. Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Leigh Powers Boan, William Walter Doar, Jr., MCNAIR LAW FIRM, PA, Pawleys Island, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Stacy W. Howard appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motions for a preliminary injunction, appointment of

counsel, and reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Howard v. Ozmint, No.

6:08-cv-03171-GRA-WMC (D.S.C. June 3 & July 13, 2009). We deny

Howard’s motions to defer filing an appendix, to file formal

briefs, and to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Howard v. Ozmint, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-ozmint-ca4-2010.