Howard v. Louisville, New Orleans & Texas Ry. Co.

67 Miss. 247
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 67 Miss. 247 (Howard v. Louisville, New Orleans & Texas Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howard v. Louisville, New Orleans & Texas Ry. Co., 67 Miss. 247 (Mich. 1889).

Opinion

Campbell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The engineer and fireman were both engaged at their duties on the engine, and neither saw the animal on the track. While a look-out should be kept when running, it is not want of proper care for the servants of the company to give needed attention to their primary duty, which is the operation of the engine; and the fact that, for a short time, neither the engineer nor fireman was looking out for animals on the track did not make the company liable for the death of the animal killed. Upon the undisputed facts, the judgment of the law is that the loss of the mare should fall on her owner rather than upon the railroad company, and, as there was nothing to be found .by a jury, the court rightly instructed for the defendant.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mobile O.R. Co. v. Johnson
126 So. 827 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1930)
Southern Ry. Co. v. Colton
138 Tenn. 300 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1917)
Granby v. Michigan Central Railroad
62 N.W. 579 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 Miss. 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-louisville-new-orleans-texas-ry-co-miss-1889.