Howard v. Kuhne

675 F. App'x 270
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 13, 2017·No. No. 16-6924·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

De’Ante Octario Howard appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Howard v. Kuhne, No. 5:13-cv-00062-FDW, 2016 WL 3437604 (W.D.N.C. June 20, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howard v. Kuhne, 675 F. App'x 270 (4th Cir. 2017).

675 F. App'x 270 (Howard v. Kuhne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related