Howard v. Howard

Missouri Court of Appeals

Howard v. Howard

885 S.W.2d 729, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1318, 1994 WL 424656

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Howard v. Howard. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 314 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 16, 1994·No. No. 64558·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Former wife appeals the denial of her motion to modify the maintenance provisions of a decree of dissolution. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Former wife appeals the denial of her motion to modify the maintenance provisions of a decree of dissolution. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Howard v. Howard, 885 S.W.2d 729, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1318, 1994 WL 424656 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

885 S.W.2d 729 (Howard v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.