Howard v. Howard

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Howard v. Howard

4 So. 3d 703, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1470, 2009 WL 413496

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 19, 2009

Docket3D09-40

StatusPublished

This text of 4 So. 3d 703 (Howard v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howard v. Howard, 4 So. 3d 703, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1470, 2009 WL 413496 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the course of a post-final judgment custody dispute in the family division of the circuit court between the parents of a sixteen year old boy, the trial judge, without notice, appropriate pleadings, or lawful authority under Chapters 39 1 61, or otherwise, ordered the custody of the child transferred to non-relatives, friends of the family who were not parties to the action. While the trial judge acted with good intentions, we find this inexplicable order a clear departure from the most essential requirements of law and it is therefore quashed and held for naught.

This order shall take effect immediately. No motion for rehearing shall be entertained.

1

. After investigation, the Department of Children and Families determined that there was no basis for a dependency or other proceeding under Chapter 39.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In the course of a post-final judgment custody dispute in the family division of the circuit court between the parents of a sixteen year old boy, the trial judge, without notice, appropriate pleadings, or lawful authority under Chapters 39 1 61, or otherwise, ordered the custody of the child transferred to non-relatives, friends of the family who were not parties to the action. While the trial judge acted with good intentions, we find this inexplicable order a clear departure from the most essential requirements of law and it is therefore quashed and held for naught.

This order shall take effect immediately. No motion for rehearing shall be entertained.

1

. After investigation, the Department of Children and Families determined that there was no basis for a dependency or other proceeding under Chapter 39.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 So. 3d 703, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1470, 2009 WL 413496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-howard-fladistctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack