Howard v. Howard

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Howard v. Howard

523 So. 2d 1224, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5862, 1988 WL 31751

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 13, 1988

DocketNos. 87-3203, 87-3204

StatusPublished

This text of 523 So. 2d 1224 (Howard v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howard v. Howard, 523 So. 2d 1224, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5862, 1988 WL 31751 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the orders at issue herein because we do not believe the appellants have demonstrated an abuse of discretion. Notwithstanding our affirmance we caution trial judges to be certain that child support orders are properly enforced even during the pendency of an action for modification by the parent obligated to make support payments. Children should not be deprived of support from a parent able to [1225]*1225pay even during the pendency of a modification proceeding.

ANSTEAD, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the orders at issue herein because we do not believe the appellants have demonstrated an abuse of discretion. Notwithstanding our affirmance we caution trial judges to be certain that child support orders are properly enforced even during the pendency of an action for modification by the parent obligated to make support payments. Children should not be deprived of support from a parent able to [1225]*1225pay even during the pendency of a modification proceeding.

ANSTEAD, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

523 So. 2d 1224, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5862, 1988 WL 31751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-howard-fladistctapp-1988.