Howard v. Howard
459 So. 2d 482, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2524, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16395
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Howard v. Howard. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Fla. L. Weekly 938 →
Opinion
AFFIRMED. Vandergriff v. Vandergriff, 456 So.2d 464 (Fla.1984); Kuvin v. Kuvin, 442 So.2d 203 (Fla.1983).
[483]*483The court was severely hampered by the lack of an adequate record, which has caused unnecessary judicial labor and delayed disposition unduly. While we have decided the case on the merits based on the record before us, we feel compelled to point out that appellant came perilously close to no review on the merits for failure ta provide an adequate record. See Clayton v. Clayton, 442 So.2d 310 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Howard v. Howard, 459 So. 2d 482, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2524, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16395 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
459 So. 2d 482 (Howard v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clayton v. Clayton
442 So. 2d 310 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Kuvin v. Kuvin
442 So. 2d 203 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Vandergriff v. Vandergriff
456 So. 2d 464 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)