Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Howard v. Howard

Howard v. Howard

459 So. 2d 482, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2524, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16395
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 3, 1984
DocketNo. AU-464
StatusPublished

This text of 459 So. 2d 482 (Howard v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howard v. Howard, 459 So. 2d 482, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2524, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16395 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Vandergriff v. Vandergriff, 456 So.2d 464 (Fla.1984); Kuvin v. Kuvin, 442 So.2d 203 (Fla.1983).

[483]*483The court was severely hampered by the lack of an adequate record, which has caused unnecessary judicial labor and delayed disposition unduly. While we have decided the case on the merits based on the record before us, we feel compelled to point out that appellant came perilously close to no review on the merits for failure ta provide an adequate record. See Clayton v. Clayton, 442 So.2d 310 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

SHIVERS, THOMPSON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clayton v. Clayton
442 So. 2d 310 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Kuvin v. Kuvin
442 So. 2d 203 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Vandergriff v. Vandergriff
456 So. 2d 464 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
459 So. 2d 482, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2524, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-howard-fladistctapp-1984.