Howard v. Howard
134 A.2d 343, 1957 D.C. App. LEXIS 270
This text of 134 A.2d 343 (Howard v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Howard v. Howard, 134 A.2d 343, 1957 D.C. App. LEXIS 270 (D.C. 1957).
Opinion
In this action for a divorce on the ground of desertion the trial court ruled that cor[344]*344roboration was required as a matter of law. For the reasons set forth in Schroeder v. Schroeder, D.C.Mun.App., 133 A.2d 470, such ruling was erroneous and requires reversal.
Reversed with instructions to grant a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Schroeder v. Schroeder
133 A.2d 470 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1957)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
134 A.2d 343, 1957 D.C. App. LEXIS 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-howard-dc-1957.