Howard v. Howard
134 A.2d 343, 1957 D.C. App. LEXIS 270
Opinion
In this action for a divorce on the ground of desertion the trial court ruled that cor[344] roboration was required as a matter of law. For the reasons set forth in Schroeder v. Schroeder, D.C.Mun.App., 133 A.2d 470, such ruling was erroneous and requires reversal.
Reversed with instructions to grant a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Howard v. Howard, 134 A.2d 343, 1957 D.C. App. LEXIS 270 (D.C. 1957).
134 A.2d 343 (Howard v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schroeder v. Schroeder
133 A.2d 470 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1957)