Howard v. H. FAIRLEY
225 S.E.2d 323, 290 N.C. 94
This text of 225 S.E.2d 323 (Howard v. H. FAIRLEY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Howard v. H. FAIRLEY, 225 S.E.2d 323, 290 N.C. 94 (N.C. 1976).
Opinion
Richard HOWARD and A. C. Goines et al., t/d/b/a Kings Drive Partnership Fund, a limited partnership
v.
Francis H. FAIRLEY et al.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
James, Williams, McElroy & Diehl, for plaintiffs.
Golding, Crews, Meekins, Gordon & Gray, Grier, Parker, Poe, Thompson, Bernstein, Gage & Preston, for defendants.
Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, 28 N.C.App. 670, 222 S.E.2d 913. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Howard v. Hamilton
222 S.E.2d 913 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1976)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
225 S.E.2d 323, 290 N.C. 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-h-fairley-nc-1976.