Howard v. Florida Parole Commission
This text of 82 So. 3d 191 (Howard v. Florida Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Consistent with the Florida Parole Commission’s proper concession of error, the petition for writ of certiorari is granted in part and the circuit court’s order denying mandamus relief is quashed. The matter is remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings concerning petitioner’s claim that the Commission did not explain its reasons for finding he was a poor candidate for parole release in its most recent order. See Alday v. Florida Parole Comm’n, 58 So.3d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). We otherwise deny the petition.
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
82 So. 3d 191, 2012 WL 833088, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-florida-parole-commission-fladistctapp-2012.