Howard v. Florida Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

589 So. 2d 1018, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11848, 1991 WL 247463
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 26, 1991·No. No. 90-973·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order denying the vacation of a default judgment entered in a child dependency case. There is record evidence appellants did not receive notice of the calendar call which they failed to attend; thus excusable neglect was demonstrated. See Dubois v. Fried, 378 So.2d 1350 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Moreover, the asserted defense that the corporal punish[1019] ment appellants administered did not amount to abuse was a meritorious defense for purposes of setting aside a default. See In Interest of D.S., 492 So.2d 797 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howard v. Florida Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 589 So. 2d 1018, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11848, 1991 WL 247463 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

589 So. 2d 1018 (Howard v. Florida Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dubois v. Fried
378 So. 2d 1350 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Shane v. State
492 So. 2d 797 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)