Howard v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

Nevada Supreme Court

Howard v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

415 P.3d 22

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided April 10, 2018·No. No. 75360·Published

Opinion

Special Public Defender

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This petition seeks a writ of prohibition or mandamus directing the district court to set aside its order reopening a case that had been administratively closed after it was consolidated with another case. Having reviewed the petition and the documents submitted in this matter, we conclude petitioner fails to demonstrate that the district court acted outside of its jurisdiction, see NRS 34.320, or arbitrarily and capriciously exercised its discretion, see Round Hill Gen. Improvement Dist. v. Newman, 97 Nev. 601, 603-04, 637 P.2d 534, 536 (1981). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Special Public Defender

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This petition seeks a writ of prohibition or mandamus directing the district court to set aside its order reopening a case that had been administratively closed after it was consolidated with another case. Having reviewed the petition and the documents submitted in this matter, we conclude petitioner fails to demonstrate that the district court acted outside of its jurisdiction, see NRS 34.320, or arbitrarily and capriciously exercised its discretion, see Round Hill Gen. Improvement Dist. v. Newman, 97 Nev. 601, 603-04, 637 P.2d 534, 536 (1981). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Howard v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev., 415 P.3d 22 (Neb. 2018).

Pincite

415 P.3d 22 (Howard v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related