Howard v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.
This text of 415 P.3d 22 (Howard v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Special Public Defender
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This petition seeks a writ of prohibition or mandamus directing the district court to set aside its order reopening a case that had been administratively closed after it was consolidated with another case. Having reviewed the petition and the documents submitted in this matter, we conclude petitioner fails to demonstrate that the district court acted outside of its jurisdiction, see NRS 34.320, or arbitrarily and capriciously exercised its discretion, see Round Hill Gen. Improvement Dist. v. Newman,
ORDER the petition DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
415 P.3d 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-eighth-judicial-dist-court-of-nev-nev-2018.