Howard v. Edwards

15 S.E. 480, 89 Ga. 367
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 27, 1892·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

[368]*368 Judgment reversed.

The grounds of demurrer by Edwards, Holden and Flynt were, (1) that the declaration sets forth no cause of action against them; (2) that it does not charge them, or any of them, with any malice towards plaintiff, nor that they maliciously had him arrested; (3) that it does not allege any facts going to show there was any want of probable cause in the proceedings against plaintiff. Jordan demurred on the grounds (1) that the declaration sets forth no cause of action against him; and-(2) that it shows that he was simply acting under the-mandate of a court of competent jurisdiction over the-subject-matter, and charges no knowledge or even belief on his part that there was any irregularity or illegality about the proceedings complained of. John W. Hixon, for plaintiff1. Horace M. Holden, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howard v. Edwards, 15 S.E. 480, 89 Ga. 367 (Ga. 1892).

15 S.E. 480 (Howard v. Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Evans v. Brown
27 S.E.2d 300 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Pardue Medicine Co. Inc. v. Pardue
22 S.E.2d 143 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
George v. Georgia Power Co.
159 S.E. 756 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Render & Hammett v. Hartford Fire Insurance
127 S.E. 902 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)