Howard v. Easton

7 Johns. 205
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1810
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 7 Johns. 205 (Howard v. Easton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howard v. Easton, 7 Johns. 205 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Here was an agreement to sell and deliver possession, as well as the improvements upon land; [207]*207and possession must be considered as an interest in land, within the meaning of the statute of frauds, so as to render the contract void, as not having been reduced to writing. Possession is prima facie evidence of title, and no title is complete without it. The judgment below must, therefore, be reversed..

Judgment reversed*

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jenkins v. Brown
173 S.E. 257 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Sarkisian v. Teele
88 N.E. 333 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1909)
Illinois Steel Co. v. Budzisz
81 N.W. 1027 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1900)
Catlett v. Dougherty
21 Ill. App. 116 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1886)
Thompson v. Tilton
34 N.J. Eq. 306 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1881)
Cassell v. Collins
23 Ala. 676 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1853)
Johnson v. Hanson
6 Ala. 351 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1844)
Putney v. Day
6 N.H. 430 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1833)
Lombard v. Ruggles
9 Me. 62 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1832)
Lower v. Winters
7 Cow. 263 (New York Supreme Court, 1827)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Johns. 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-easton-nysupct-1810.