Howard v. Easton
This text of 7 Johns. 205 (Howard v. Easton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Here was an agreement to sell and deliver possession, as well as the improvements upon land; [207]*207and possession must be considered as an interest in land, within the meaning of the statute of frauds, so as to render the contract void, as not having been reduced to writing. Possession is prima facie evidence of title, and no title is complete without it. The judgment below must, therefore, be reversed..
Judgment reversed*
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Johns. 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-easton-nysupct-1810.