Howard v. Devol

46 P. 235, 15 Wash. 270, 1896 Wash. LEXIS 173
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 26, 1896
DocketNo. 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 46 P. 235 (Howard v. Devol) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howard v. Devol, 46 P. 235, 15 Wash. 270, 1896 Wash. LEXIS 173 (Wash. 1896).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff brought an action against W. A. Lewis and his wife to foreclose a mortgage upon real estate. He obtained a judgment therein and a sale of the property was had, but not enough being realized to satisfy the mortgage, he brought this action to have the judgment for the deficiency adjudged a lien upon certain real estate belonging to the defendants in the other action, prior to the lien of a judgment obtained against them by the respondent. The court sustained a demurrer to the complaint and the plaintiff has appealed.

We find it unnecessary to consider many of the objections urged against the complaint, as we are of the opinion that the demurrer was well taken, for the reason that the complaint failed to state that the de[272]*272fendants Lewis were insolvent, or that any execution had been issued against them for the deficiency upon the mortgage foreclosure judgment, and returned unsatisfied: Before the plaintiff could attack the respondent’s lien upon the premises in question, or ask that it be subjected to his lien, it was necessary for him to make one or the other of these allegations.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Konnerup v. Milspaugh
126 P. 939 (Washington Supreme Court, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 P. 235, 15 Wash. 270, 1896 Wash. LEXIS 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-devol-wash-1896.