Howard v. Department of Health & Rehabilitation Services, Inc.
This text of 541 So. 2d 117 (Howard v. Department of Health & Rehabilitation Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
At least one medical expert rendered a strong opinion, in the record, that the negligence of the health-care facility was a substantial factor contributing to the victim’s demise. It cannot be said, consequently, for the purpose of a summary judgment, that the defendant has demonstrated conclusively the nonexistence of a material dispute on the issue of proximate causation. Glotzer v. Moselle, 515 So.2d 375 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Sprague v. Coral Cadillac, Inc., 515 So.2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Fleischman v. Perez, 491 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). A trial court may not weigh contradictory depositions or affidavits on matters of fact in entering a summary judgment.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
541 So. 2d 117, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 687, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1289, 1989 WL 21422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-department-of-health-rehabilitation-services-inc-fladistctapp-1989.