Howard v. Cotter
This text of 242 A.D. 727 (Howard v. Cotter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, in so far as appealed from, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion granted restraining the defendants from using the word “ regular.” In our opinion the use of the word “ regular ” by these defendants tends to mislead the primary electors as to the status of the defendants. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., not voting. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 A.D. 727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-cotter-nyappdiv-1934.