Howard v. Cotter
242 A.D. 727
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 15, 1934·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Order, in so far as appealed from, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion granted restraining the defendants from using the word “ regular.” In our opinion the use of the word “ regular ” by these defendants tends to mislead the primary electors as to the status of the defendants. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., not voting. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Howard v. Cotter, 242 A.D. 727 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
242 A.D. 727 (Howard v. Cotter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dixon v. Corrigan
208 Misc. 911 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)
Thompson v. Cohen
179 Misc. 70 (New York Supreme Court, 1942)