Howard v. Costello

31 Ill. App. 611, 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 423
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedApril 3, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 31 Ill. App. 611 (Howard v. Costello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howard v. Costello, 31 Ill. App. 611, 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 423 (Ill. Ct. App. 1889).

Opinion

Gary, J.

If one of two or-‘more defendants against whom judgment is entered before a justice takes an appeal alone, the other defendant or defendants must be summoned, or return of not found had, under Sec. 70 of the Act of 1873, concerning justices, before the case can be disposed of. Steinborn v. Thomas, 8 Ill. App. 515; Humphreys v. Rodgers, 9 Ill. App. 281; Walter v. Bierman, 59 Ill. 186; Stewart v. Peters, 33 Ill. 384.

This rule having been disregarded in this cas* the judgment must be reversed and the case remanded for proceedings required by the statute.

jReversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tongeln v. Knoll
227 Ill. App. 317 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1923)
Norton v. Coggswell
35 Ill. App. 566 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 Ill. App. 611, 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-costello-illappct-1889.