Howard v. Costello

Appellate Court of Illinois

Howard v. Costello

31 Ill. App. 611, 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 423

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided April 3, 1889·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Gary, J.

If one of two or-‘more defendants against whom judgment is entered before a justice takes an appeal alone, the other defendant or defendants must be summoned, or return of not found had, under Sec. 70 of the Act of 1873, concerning justices, before the case can be disposed of. Steinborn v. Thomas, 8 Ill. App. 515; Humphreys v. Rodgers, 9 Ill. App. 281; Walter v. Bierman, 59 Ill. 186; Stewart v. Peters, 33 Ill. 384.

This rule having been disregarded in this cas* the judgment must be reversed and the case remanded for proceedings required by the statute.

jReversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gary, J.

If one of two or-‘more defendants against whom judgment is entered before a justice takes an appeal alone, the other defendant or defendants must be summoned, or return of not found had, under Sec. 70 of the Act of 1873, concerning justices, before the case can be disposed of. Steinborn v. Thomas, 8 Ill. App. 515; Humphreys v. Rodgers, 9 Ill. App. 281; Walter v. Bierman, 59 Ill. 186; Stewart v. Peters, 33 Ill. 384.

This rule having been disregarded in this cas* the judgment must be reversed and the case remanded for proceedings required by the statute.

jReversed and remanded.

Howard v. Costello, 31 Ill. App. 611, 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 423 (Ill. Ct. App. 1889).

Pincite

31 Ill. App. 611 (Howard v. Costello) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related